Newsletter
Adverts

Advertise in Diverse magazine

Liverpool City Council Equal Opportunities

View Diverse 7 here

We can't indulge in this nostalgia. Racism today is subtle and complex

by Simon Woolley

:
:
:
:
Simon Woolley

Black leaders have moved on from the 1980s, and discrimination has changed too

 

To some the past is always golden, the present bleak and the future bleaker. Last week Joseph Harker indulged in a trip down memory lane, reminiscing about the challenges the black community faced during the 80s, and its leadership (For black Britons, this isn't the 80s revisited. It's worse, 12 August).

 

In 1985 Bernie Grant's "connection with local people made him hugely popular and two years later he was elected MP", says Harker. "Paul Boateng, who had been a campaigning civil rights lawyer, greeted his own election the same night by declaring: 'Today Brent South, tomorrow Soweto'." And he claims: "Today we have a dozen black MPs … but their backgrounds are a million miles from the community activism of their predecessors."

 

Harker looks back not just with rose-tinted glasses but with 3D shades. Yes, we had Bernie Grant, never afraid to fight and grounded in the community; but the black unity that swept him, Boateng, Diane Abbott and Keith Vaz into power was trumped shortly afterwards by personal ambition.

 

The institutions which Harker refers to – in particular the Commission for Racial Equality – were a reflection of the society we lived in. Racism was crude and easy to identify. A significant number of police officers would "fit up" black people for crimes they didn't commit: from planting drugs, to fabricating evidence and wrongly convicting them of murder – as they did with the Cardiff three and the Tottenham three.

 

Today the discriminatory factors that hold back black individuals are more subtle, more complex. We know, for example, that recruitment selection panels tend to recruit a reflection of themselves. Which is not good if you're not white and male. But how do you legislate when discrimination is so difficult to prove?

 

In order to tackle persistent inequality we still need the big stick – the law – but more than that we need sophisticated methods that change not just the process but also the thinking behind why others are seen as less able.

 

Harker's greatest insult was his negation of black leadership today. "So who, today, speaks for black people?" He mentions Diane Abbott MP but ignores black church leaders ministering to packed churches every Sunday, or activists such as barrister Matthew Ryder, Dr Rob Berkeley at the Runnymede Trust, and author Dreda Say Mitchell. These and other community leaders have responded. It's not their fault they are undermined and largely ignored.

 

The work continues. One agreed suggestion has been to organise the largest political empowerment programme this country has ever seen. We start with an event this Friday.

 

We all want a better society. We'll do it together, by understanding and engaging with the system. By holding politicians to account, demanding greater equality of opportunity, and nurturing a generation of politicians away from the egotistical path that sees many rise only to vanish without trace.

 

There are challenges for the black community and wider society, but the answer isn't to indulge in nostalgia, but to plan for the future: less greed, more opportunities and, above all, hope.

    send to a friend | add comment

    rating star rating star rating star rating star rating star

    rating: 2.5

    Comments
    :
    :

    Tod O'Brien (9.9.2011, 09:09)

    This whole issue is not now about protected characteristics but inclusivity.It needs a mind set change for all members of society if we wish to see true integration. Minorities and majorities can shift their view to one of inclusiveness but as ever it requires a groundswell of attitudinal change from the institutions(Govt,Police,Judiciary and especially education) The remark by the Liverpool hospital is almost certainly not an isolated one but an indication of where the mindset is in publice services and business. Individuals bring about change not organisations or policies and so that is where we need to focus. All too often when I deliver "Diversity" (Dont you just hate that word, I refer to Managing Difference) it is still a tick box action. A large Scottish council where I recently worked wanted me to replace the content I had designed around Emotional Intelligence and personal Values and beliefs to one of 36 slides telling their people about the law.Why? because it kept them safe from litigation.They were not interested in attitudinal and culture change or improving their service to all groups.Needless to say I withdrew my learning from them.Also it is very interesting, as in this council, that none of the strategic leaders attended,they obviously did not need this training sic, and the 400 people that I did train before the withdrawal really loved the training because it was refreshingly different and made them think much more deeply than before about the issues,and went on to recommend that their senior managers should also attend it. So to summarise black leadership needs to move on to address the issue of discrimination in a much more thoughtful and deeper way in order to meet the threat of a much more subltle and insidious racism and discrimination than ever before.

    JAGS (8.9.2011, 13:51)

    The most significant suggestion that Mr. Harker makes, I think, is that "Today the discriminatory factors that hold back black individuals are more subtle, more complex." The biggest challenge that black activists faced during the heady days of the 80s was to be courageous in fighting battles alone against an enemy and issues that were, as he says, "...crude and easy to identify". If we are to consider subsequent campaigns in terms of confronting different "more subtle, more complex" forms of racism - and who's to say that this isn't true - we also need, then, to consider the different challenges involved in achieving that effectively. Are courage, energy, good organisation, along with an untempered desire to confront sufficient to expose and suppress a new racism? I don't think so, myself! If Mr. Harker insists on wagging accusatory fingers at the church or even the party politik simply because they are in a position of leadership then I feel he is making a fundamental mistake. His oversight neglects considering the different sorts of challenge of new leadership ahead and whether or not those traditionally charged with the responsibility of leadimg remain the best poised to lead today. Do we (I presume Mr. Harker means the Black British) really need a leadership today? If we do, should that be based on a model of what we traditionally understand to be leadership? If not, what sort of leadership is required? It follows, then, that we start to think about whether or not leadership is something that can become a reality and not just a mere notion, or even worse, a form of "nostalgia" Mr. Harker refers to.
    Adverts

    View Diverse 7 here

    Riverside HA